Jobs Boards – Ditch The Resume DB Please, get SOCIAL

Ah, the good old resume database. How I hate thee. Might sound a little harsh but having worked at job boards in a sales capacity for 6 years I think I have every right to say they are fundamentally floored in today’s market. You see if I had a $ for every time I had a client say “It’s a waste of money, all the candidates are old or not relevant” I’d be a millionaire.

The major problem with the Resume Database as we know it, is that it is WAY to simple for a candidate to put the resume up there and do nothing else with it. This causes many problems. Often they sit there for years and more often then not they classify themselves in the wrong way. So how can job boards take the resume database forward and socialise this aspect of their sites.

I have one word for you, “Community”. The Resume database on most job boards is a formant sleeping giant. The candidates are asleep and the Employers/Recruiters are getting lost in the maze. Where is the interaction and engagement, what’s the point of having 300,000 people on a database if talking to them is near impossible. Greater engagement would mean greater value, not only to the job board in terms of revenue but to the candidate and employer in terms of faster matches.

So rather then candidates simply uploading a word doc, here is what it perhaps should look like.

1. Candidates creates Profile similar to Visualcv.com with added fields to create competencies that show specific situations of soft skill usage ie Leadership, Organisation, Decision making etc. Provide examples.
2. All Fields are searchable and the candidate has the ability to keep any fields “Private” as to avoid current Employer finding them.
3. Employers have their Company Profiles integrated in to the Community to enable candidates to shop around, search jobs, leave messages for HR or line managers.
4. Candidates and Employers can engage via SM tools such as chat, video messages, twitter feed, Forum engagement, connecting with like skilled candidates (similar to connecting on LI or Facebook)
5. Candidates can communicate with each other about current job searching issues or experiences and Employers have the ability to see this and react.
5. Employer talks/finds candidate they like. Candidate and Employer can organise “Virtual” interview via video next time they are both on line.
6. Candidate and Employer meet face to face and candidate is hired.

And this is just a start…….

Not only will the whole process be more transparent, but the interaction and engagement will be far more beneficial for both sides. And I’m sure far easier to justify the price of the database “Community”, then it is now.

Katherine Robinson wrote a great blog this week that focused on the front end for the advertisers. I totally agree with her comments.

Perhaps we are both barking mad, but I seriously think job boards will need to adapt and move with the times in order to maintain their value. The Greg Savage “Post and Pray” methd is simply not effective, and allowing candidates to just “spray” their CV’s off also needs reviewing. Something does need to change.

Job boards may not die, but they certainly will if they don’t move with the times.

And don’t get me started on ATS platforms, grrrr, but that’s for another blog.

6 comments

  1. [...] This post was Twitted by SiteAdvisor [...]

  2. Simon Lewis says:

    Justin, a considered piece. I agree wholeheartedly that unless job boards evolve they will be redundant by the end of 2010. Getting social is the natural progression but that means removing the focus on automated process (skulking in the shadows as I call it) and getting out-and-about – showing folk who’s behind the technology.

    Most job boards are run by technical people who have little or no idea about the 360 recruitment process. Without this knowledge I find it hard to see how true, authentic social engagement will become a tangible reality.

    However, getting visible is the reason why I am continually knackered!!

  3. Thanks Simon,

    End of 2010, interesting date. I think a shift will occur by then but it will be by niche boards more so, the big players are to scared of a change like this as they are worried about potentially losing traffic and then in turn market share.

    “Most job boards are run by technical people” I think this is part of the problem. Without stereotyping every technical person, being social is something that technical folk are not great at.

    And I think it’s the beers mate that contribute to your lack of energy lol.

  4. [...] This post was Twitted by Justin_Hillier [...]

  5. Justin,

    Your views on Job Board online DB’s are very intersting and in many ways reflect the work I have been doing in 2009. with the creation of http://www.in-the-know.co.uk .

    We have steered away from the social aspects you talk about and instead have focused on creating an objective and confidential platform that adds real value across both sides of the recruitment process.

    By definition, open access databases are uber subjective – candidates can only give their own opinion of themselves in their profile. You’re right, it is far too easy for a Job Seeker to create a profile and to use that profile to ensure the reader is using rose tinted spectacles.

    Confidentiality is critical. Job Boards sell theire databases so agressively directly to end users with no consideration for the confidentiality of the Job Seekers that ultimately they rely upon for the databases success. Job Seekers are catching on – but still they post with Monster, TJ, JS et al.

    As to whether Employers really want the forum to chat with Job Seekers – my experience with Employers is that they are too busy doing their day job to recruit properly anyway. They just won’t have the time or inclination to tweet with Job Seekers about their working environment….

    Interesting times indeed.

  6. Xforexer says:

    Excuse me. Does someone know how to find an actual Expert Avisor from fake and a true trading signal from fake? big thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>